Viewport width =
August 14, 2006 | by  | in Opinion |
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

VUSWA Budget

Last Wednesday the VUWSA executive passed the 2006 budget. The budget passed shows that VUWSA will make a $103,000 deficit for 2006. In 2005 we made a deficit of roughly $100,000. In both 2006 and 2005 the Student Union complex contribution of $175,000 wasn’t charged, and if it had been, our deficit would be closer to $300,000 for each of those years. In 2004, the only reason we made a surplus was because the $175,000 wasn’t charged. Next year, given the really positive progress we have made on the Student Union complex negotiations, we expect to be paying the $175,000 once again.

This week Salient is doing a feature on the levy and related issues, so I’ll try not to double up. But the basic facts are that VUWSA has a levy of $99 which was set back in 1998 for the 1999 financial year. Every year our costs go up with inflation, but the levy remains static. At the VUWSA AGM on September 6th we are likely to be discussing the possibility of raising the VUWSA levy. At this meeting students will have to decide whether they want to maintain current levels of services and increase the levy, or keep the current levy which will mean that VUWSA has to significantly reduce its level of operations.

Elsewhere in this magazine I’ve written a piece opposing increases to student fees. Some could argue there is a contradiction between arguing that the VUWSA levy will probably have to increase its levy and not wanting the university council to raise tuition fees. The fundamental difference here is that tertiary education is a public good and should be publicly funded (which has been VUWSA’s position throughout the ages) and that increased costs to institutions like Victoria should be covered by the government. Fundamentally the proportion of costs that students pay in course fees is already too high now, so any increase exacerbates this problem.

By contrast I believe that the $99 VUWSA levy set in 1998 was correct at the time. However after 8 years of cost increases, the expansion of Victoria onto four campuses and with the general cost increases it is clear that there is a gap. Currently VUWSA’s level of expenditure is too high for its annual income. VUWSA’s main source of income is the levy. Our levy is one of the lower ones in the country; by comparison Massey Wellington charges $130 and Massey Palmerton North charges even more. At the University of Auckland the students’ association largely relies on money from the university to provide services, and they do this due to being a voluntary association (the only university students’ association in Aotearoa that is). Generally a lot of the services that VUWSA provide are of considerable importance, and if we didn’t provide them the university would have to pick up the tab. In reality if VUWSA’s levy stays the same or drops, it would result in the university increasing levies such as the student services levy or the Amenities to pick up things VUWSA could no longer fund (eg. SJS, Welfare services, advocacy services, clubs etc). At least with the VUWSA levy students get democratic control over how this is spent.

When I first started on the exec in 2003 our concern was that our surplus was too high and this meant we hadn’t spent enough of the student money given to us. The previous year the exec had faced issues with over spending, and had made considerable cut backs, which many of us believed cut into what was VUWSA’s core business (cutting club grants etc). From 2003 onwards we returned to previous levels of spending and started extending our services to satellite campuses (Pipitea mainly). I still believe this was the right decision, but clearly the revenue situation hasn’t been addressed since then.

A number of our processes are also in need of review. Since 2003 the earliest we’ve managed to pass a budget was August of that financial year (this year included). There are various other processes that also need serious review. The VUWSA Trust has agreed to pay for Horwath Strategy (Wellington) Limited accountants to come in and review our financial and budgeting systems. They will go through and look for ways we can be more efficient and provide the services that we want in the most cost effective way. They will also be looking at our revenue and expenditure levels, and make suggestions as to what might be considered appropriate.

We will also be looking at ways to improve our accountability structures within VUWSA. Part of this is getting the budgets done on time. In our 2006 strategic plan we have set a target of getting the 2007 budget done by the end of this year. We will work with the incoming 2007 executive to see that this is done. This provides VUWSA with far greater accountability and financial control from day one of the next financial year.

The current budget issues we have are clearly fundamental, and have now existed for a number of years. As the VUWSA President I am committed to working through this issue and seeing that we have the best possible result for students, both in the short and long term. I look forward to getting VUWSA back to a position of financial health for the coming year.

Notice:

Part 2 of the SRC series on the current crises in with Israel, Lebanon and Palestine. This week David Zwartz, the honorary Consulate in NZ for the Israeli government and Don Carson from the Wellington Palestine group will debate the current issues. 12noon, Wednesday in the Mt Street Bar and Cafe.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

About the Author ()

Comments (8)

Trackback URL / Comments RSS Feed

  1. Nicholas O'Kane says:

    This is a propaganda piece outlining the reasons for a levy (fee) increase and doesn’t mention the unnesescary spending in the VUWSA budget like the $250 on having a photo taken, $3000 on taxi trips, $1021 on dinners, $1 600 on decorations, around $9 000 on having three new unesescary exec members or plenty of other cases of unessescary extravagence and spending. I think students should know what VUWSA spends its money on.

  2. blogetee says:

    yeha thatll make a big difference to the budget eh o’kane….. around $13,000…. yeah right…..

  3. Does anyone else think Nick Kelly looks kind of like a girl?
    a slightly nerdy but could be hot girl :) wow

  4. Jonny Crockett says:

    Nick, you are a dick, whoever you are.

    It’s a president’s column. It’s the President’s opinion of where he wants to take his organisation. It’s not even trying to NOT be propaganda.

  5. Nicholas O'kane says:

    “yeha thatll make a big difference to the budget eh o’kane….. around $13,000…. yeah right”- this $13 000 is just the begining. What will make a big difference is the half million spent in “salaries”, the $50 000 in honoriaria and bonuses. While some of this spending is legitimate, given that we can find unesescary spending in these areas were likely to find it hidden under various headings.

  6. blogetee says:

    whatever

  7. Nick Kelly says:

    I think its correct that this piece is largely my opinion on the current Financil and budget situation of the Students’ Association. It would be concerning if the VUWSA President as the Financial leader of the association didn’t have an opinion on the levy or the budget.
    At the same time we are having a review to look at ways to make our $$ go further. However the issue is that when the income recieved from the levy and other sources is $300,000 less than our expenditure is likely to be in 2007 once we are paying the contribution to the Student Union Complex then its clearly time to look what the levy should be. Ultimately it is the students who will make the call at the VUWSA AGM on Septmeber the 6th. But I felt it was important to use my column this week to give my point of view having spent a considerable amount of time working on this issue.

    But in the mean time the Taxi Chits are locked in the safe, there a no more dinners or even food at exec meetings…so fear not we are making savings.

    I recon I look more like Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin…

  8. At the AGM, Nick?

    Schedule 5, cl 1 of the VUWSA Constitution makes it clear that the annual subscription is set at an SGM:

    “The Executive shall determine the budget, and recommend the level of annual subscription to a Special General Meeting.”

Recent posts

  1. Am I my skin?
  2. The Trauma of the Non-Voter
  3. Marshall Islands deliberate whether to ban nuclear weapons
  4. Vanity Fair — W. M. Thackeray
  5. Her Legacy
  6. GIG GUIDE
  7. The Fury of [our] own Momentum: Twin Peaks, Protest, and the Bomb
  8. VUWSA
  9. Editors’ Letter
  10. Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle
brigid

Editor's Pick

I’m Not Sure How I Feel: Disillusionment With Elections

: - SPONSORED - This post-election sentiment was written prior to the election, due to both the limitations of print and the pervasiveness of this disillusionment beyond the election’s outcome. If there was a revolution over the weekend, some of these thoughts can be disregarded.