Viewport width =
August 7, 2006 | by  | in News |
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

VUWSA Backtrack on Levy Hike

The release of the VUWSA budget has been delayed yet again, this time in a scramble of cost-cutting that, if not effective, may lead to an increased student levy.

VUWSA President Nick Kelly says the financial situation of the organisation has led him to change his mind on the issue of raising the levy, after previously believing that it would be hypocritical for VUWSA to raise the levy while campaigning against rising University fees.

Former President Jeremy Greenbrook- Held acknowledges that VUWSA is stuck with increasing costs and a static income, but says “no matter which way you look at it [it is] a bit hypocritical.”

However, he says other solutions, such as reducing contributions made to the VUWSA trust and diversifying their income could be effective.

The budget, originally supposed to be released last Tuesday, is now due to be finalised today. Welfare Vice President Jules van Cruysen says that the reason for the further delay was “systemic” and beyond anyone’s control, but does not elaborate further, noting that the budget has not been released earlier than August for many years.

Costs are to be cut in the portfolios of clubs, activities, education and welfare as well as asking clubs and representative groups to do as much cost cutting as possible over the rest of the year. Kelly says that the budget cuts will not affect the fundamental running of VUWSA.

Exec members are not giving out any information over what the deficit was before the decision was made to make cuts, or what the deficit is likely to be after the cuts.

Rises in the levy could take the form of an inflation-adjusted measure or a set increase approved by a Student Representative Council meeting.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

About the Author ()

Comments (5)

Trackback URL / Comments RSS Feed

  1. SRCs have no power over financial matters.

    Moreover, the ‘internal components’ of the VUWSA levy (that part-time students pay $66) was set by a motion at an SGM (which can’t be over-ruled by an SRC).

  2. Greg says:

    Essentially will people vote for more of their money to go to VUWSA?
    Well, if the organisation was run and clearly benefited students, then yes they would. But at the moment, the organisation is a mess, so I doubt it.

  3. peteremcc says:

    Greg, the question isn’t whether people will vote for it, but whether enough people will vote against it. We have to make sure that if it does come up, we have enough people there to throw it out. While VUWSA might be hopeless, I wouldn’t be surprised if they slipped it into a meeting somewhere and managed to rake up 40 odd people to come and vote for it.

    Thats the main concern.

  4. Remember, General Meetings have a quorum requirement of 100, unline the 50 for SRC’s. And as the levy requires the text of the constitution, it would require a two-third majority to come into effect.

  5. peteremcc says:

    Well thats a bit more reassuring. :)

    i do find it disappointing however when people (no one inparticular guys) laugh at VUWSA for everyones disinterest and then complain about what VUWSA is doing. If we got more people involved, maybe we wouldn’t have such a large problem.

Recent posts

  1. An (im)possible dream: Living Wage for Vic Books
  2. Salient and VUW tussle over Official Information Act requests
  3. One Ocean
  4. Orphanage voluntourism a harmful exercise
  5. Interview with Grayson Gilmour
  6. Political Round Up
  7. A Town Like Alice — Nevil Shute
  8. Presidential Address
  9. Do You Ever Feel Like a Plastic Bag?
  10. Sport
1

Editor's Pick

In Which a Boy Leaves

: - SPONSORED - I’ve always been a fairly lucky kid. I essentially lucked out at birth, being born white, male, heterosexual, to a well off family. My life was never going to be particularly hard. And so my tale begins, with another stroke of sheer luck. After my girlfriend sugge