Viewport width =
July 9, 2007 | by  | in Opinion |
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

Nanny State

Time to Beat the Bitch Back!

I can’t be sure, but it may well have been me who introduced the term “Nanny State” into the New Zealand vernacular, on my Politically Incorrect Show on Radio Pacific. Certainly I used it regularly there, and observed it percolate into common usage thereafter, as did the related term, “Helengrad.” In any event, the expression is well and truly out there now, and that’s as good a thing as its referent is bad. Nanny State is vicious, anti-human … and, as we speak, relentlessly advancing.

Who is she, this hybrid of gargoyle and dominatrix?

She is the strident, scolding, snooping socialist, the control-freak who seeks to regulate every aspect of our existence. She forbids our kids to eat pies and chips at school; she instructs us on how not to discipline them; she forbids us to read magazines like Cigar Aficionado and closes down cigar bars; she jails us for smoking marijuana or popping party pills; she confiscates our money at every turn and refuses to give any of it back even when she’s awash in it. She runs our die-while-you-wait health system and covers up the waiting by destroying the waiting lists; she prefers bureaucrats (her soulmates) over practitioners and drowns the productive in paperwork; her child-molesters-of-the-mind run our education system on her behalf and deliberately dumb down our youngsters so they’ll vote for her when they come of age (hence the illiterate zombies emerging from her universities); she pays the unproductive with the money of the productive to be reproductive and breed even more voters for her; she forbids us to cut down trees in our own back yards or add decks to our own houses; she snuggles up to Islamofascists (more of her soulmates) and is currently planning on forbidding us to criticise them (“hate speech” laws) … and on and on. She is, in short, the drooling wannabe totalitarian whose source of orgasm is power-lust, seeking to dictate what we eat, drink, think, say and wear. She is Labour and National, “liberal” and conservative, Helen Clark and Rob Muldoon, communism and fascism, Stalin and Hitler (the vegetarian teetotaller who headed the world’s first Green and officially anti-smoking regime) … and she sucks.

Nanny likes to remind us that we’re not here to enjoy ourselves. She is the Puritan described by H. L. Mencken, perennially paranoid that somebody, somewhere, somehow might just be managing to have a good time. Sex is a particular bugbear of course, as we see from this June 14 story on CNN re Nanny’s Islamofascist incarnation:

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran’s parliament on Wednesday voted in favor of a bill that could lead to the death penalty for persons convicted of working in the production of pornographic movies.

Alcohol, too. Here we needn’t look beyond “the land of the free” to discover a killjoy zeal that would make the Taliban, or Adolf Anderton, proud:

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA. – Ryan Kenty, 20, and his brother Brandon, a sophomore in high school, plan to drive their mother to jail Monday morning before heading back to her rented apartment to move the rest of her belongings into storage. Their mom, Elisa Kelly, and her ex-husband, George Robinson, are paying the price for hosting Ryan’s 16th birthday party — more than two years in jail each. Ryan had asked his mother to buy his friends some beer and wine, as long as they all spent the night.In this season of graduation parties, the story of the couple is a cautionary tale for parents if they plan to serve alcohol — or look the other way.

TV3’s John Campbell claimed in his studio discussion on Nanny-NZ’s new rules about pies and chips in school that “talkbackland” would see the measures as “Nanny State” gone mad. I e-mailed him saying, “I wish!” He responded asking me where I would draw the line—was Nanny not entitled to do anything? Was there no line to be drawn at all?

I replied:

Oh, but of course there is. Nanny must protect us from the initiation of force or fraud by others, and use retaliatory force against those who do initiate force, and bring them to justice. Thus—the military, police, law courts, laws against murder, rape, drunk-driving, etc.. All entirely proper. In your socialist utopias, however, Nanny goes way beyond this and HERSELF initiates force, prohibiting all manner of voluntary activities among consenting adults. Hence the term “Nanny,” actually—scolding, prescribing and proscribing.

Nanny’s essential sin is to deny beings of choice the freedom to exercise it. If ever there were a case for going “back to nature” it’s going back to human nature, whereby governments protect rather than violate our rights. Nanny should be made to back off and butt out. It’s time to beat the bitch back.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

About the Author ()

Comments (4)

Trackback URL / Comments RSS Feed

  1. seann says:

    I agree with everything Lindsay said above – too be sure Helen is the quintessential cold-blooded smiling zombie. A big fake.

    I only want clarification on this:

    “Nanny must protect us from the initiation of force or fraud by others, and use retaliatory force against those who do initiate force, and bring them to justice. Thus—the military, police, law courts, laws against murder, rape, drunk-driving, etc..”

    Lindsay, these are Nanny’s favourite kiddies. They protect Her and Her terrorism. How are we protected from them? Why do we accept their legitimacy?

  2. Allan Watson says:

    Comrade Helen’s support of Sue Bradford’s “anti-smacking” bill did absolutely nothing to protect Nia Glassie who now occupies a position in Tokoroa Cemetary.

    No legislation can prevent crime, only create it. Atrocities will always be committed by those who choose to ignore all morals and ethics.

    Question.

    At Tokoroa Cosmopolitan Club, we have a House Rule prohibiting the wearing of “Gang Patches” within the Club. One member regulary wears a Labour Party Badge on his jacket. Can a Labour Party Badge be considered to be a “Gang Patch” ?

    Allan Watson
    Tokoroa

  3. Allan Watson says:

    Comrade Helen’s support of Sue Bradford’s “anti-smacking” bill did absolutely nothing to protect Nia Glassie who now occupies a position in Tokoroa Cemetary.

    No legislation can prevent crime, only create it. Atrocities will always be committed by those who choose to ignore all morals and ethics.

    Question.

    At Tokoroa Cosmopolitan Club, we have a House Rule prohibiting the wearing of “Gang Patches” within the Club. One member regularly wears a Labour Party Badge on his jacket. Can a Labour Party Badge be considered to be a “Gang Patch” ?

    Allan Watson
    Tokoroa

  4. jhonka says:

    “this hybrid of gargoyle and dominatrix?”
    bwhahah,
    you think yourself very clever dont you?
    “Stalin and Hitler” – possibly a bit of a big statement? linking helen to two of the greatest mass murderers of history.
    Seems to me this blog is all show and no business, someone likes the sound of their own voice a bit too much, but sadly is uncapable of using it to say anything intelligent. If you’ve got nothing to say but make sweeping statements with no evidence perhaps its best you say nothing.

Recent posts

  1. The Party Line
  2. Te Ara Tauira
  3. Robotic Legs, “Inspiration”, and Disability in Film
  4. VICUFO
  5. VUWSA
  6. One Ocean
  7. Steel and Sting
  8. RE: Conceptual Romance
  9. Voluntary WOF a Step in the Right Direction
  10. Cuts From the Deep: Lucille Bogan
redalert1

Editor's Pick

RED

: - SPONSORED - I have always thought that red was a sneaky, manipulative colour for Frank Jackson to choose in his Black and White Mary thought experiment. It is the colour of the most evocative emotions, love and hate, and symbolises some of the most intense human experiences, bi