Viewport width =
August 2, 2015 | by  | in Science |
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

Debunking the rumours: Are we really set for an ice age in 2030?

Considering the fearful imagery of burning and melting some expect to see in our future (thanks to global warming), the prospect of a “mini ice age” almost sounds pleasant at first. Perhaps the “cooler” nature of this “predicted ice age” is what made it gather so much publicity, but put your thermals away and don’t plan your 2030 ski vacations just yet—once again, we’ve been led astray by poor wording and media misinterpretation.

A press release by the Royal Astronomical Society on 2 July was intended to announce a presentation by University of Newcastle’s Valentina Zharkova, a Professor of Mathematics. Zharkova and her team of researchers had been analysing the 11-year cycles of the sun. Their model of the sun’s solar cycle yielded the prediction that “solar activity will fall by 60 per cent during the 2030s”. This occurrence is known as a Maunder Minimum and was last seen during a mini ice age in the Northern Hemisphere between 1645 and 1715, where notable harsh winters were experienced, along with the touted tale of the River Thames freezing over.

While Zharkova was predicting a new Maunder Minimum, her research was not necessarily predicting an ice age. In the last Maunder Minimum, the low solar activity was not the cause of the ice age. In fact, the first signs of this ice age, such as strong frosts on the River Thames, emerged almost four decades before the reduction in solar activity, in 1608.

If you’re still wondering whether you should be stressing about an ice age or not, you should note that Zharkova and her researchers were looking at this from a purely astronomical perspective, and their predictions were based on a model that is not yet part of a peer-reviewed, published study. Zharkova also later said in an interview that she herself “didn’t mention anything about the weather change”. While Zharkova does think the solar activity could have an impact on the climate, Professor of Meteorology at Pennsylvania State University Michael Mann argues that anthropogenic global warming (the human contribution of greenhouse gas emissions) will far outweigh any solar induced climate effects.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

About the Author ()

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

  1. An (im)possible dream: Living Wage for Vic Books
  2. Salient and VUW tussle over Official Information Act requests
  3. One Ocean
  4. Orphanage voluntourism a harmful exercise
  5. Interview with Grayson Gilmour
  6. Political Round Up
  7. A Town Like Alice — Nevil Shute
  8. Presidential Address
  9. Do You Ever Feel Like a Plastic Bag?
  10. Sport
1

Editor's Pick

In Which a Boy Leaves

: - SPONSORED - I’ve always been a fairly lucky kid. I essentially lucked out at birth, being born white, male, heterosexual, to a well off family. My life was never going to be particularly hard. And so my tale begins, with another stroke of sheer luck. After my girlfriend sugge