Viewport width =
March 20, 2017 | by  | in Politics |
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

The Party Line

On the Spinoffon February 27, leading electoral law expert Andrew Geddis reported that a changed interpretation of the Broadcasting Act 1989 “allows everyone and anyone who isn’t a party or candidate” to now run attack adverts which disparage politicians on broadcast media (television and radio). Do you think the new interpretation of the Broadcasting Act could impact this year’s election?

 

Young Nats — Lower North Island

The base of this issue is one of freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is a principle the Young Nats staunchly stand by and it plays into our party’s founding purpose of supporting individual responsibility and freedoms. However, this must be balanced with protections to limit any slanderous or untrue statements being advertised.

Overall, we don’t believe this new interpretation will lead to a major impact on this year’s election. The focus of the election is on the various political groups vying for Parliament, and New Zealand has a proud tradition of remaining policy-centred and avoiding attack politics to the extreme.

Being free to express a political opinion is key to an open and frank election process and will hopefully lead to a more consensus based government for New Zealand.

— Sam Stead

 

Vic Labour

Labour is extremely concerned at this new interpretation of the Broadcasting Act. While the court case that led to it was about protecting the right of artists to free speech (a worthy cause), it has potentially opened the door to something wider and more malicious.

It could let a small minority of wealthy individuals and big businesses control the debate on our screens and even influence the result. We’ve seen the terrible results of these kinds of laws overseas, particularly in the US, where having a shit-ton of money is essential to being a voice in the political debate. The effect of this would be to stifle progressive voices in particular; this is why you’ll see conservatives enthusiastically supporting this interpretation of the Act. This is not the New Zealand way — we pride ourselves on our equality. Labour hopes that this unintended consequence does not occur.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

About the Author ()

Salient is a magazine. Salient is a website. Salient is an institution founded in 1938 to cater to the whim and fancy of students of Victoria University. We are partly funded by VUWSA and partly by gold bullion that was discovered under a pile of old Salients from the 40's. Salient welcomes your participation in debate on all the issues that we present to you, and if you're a student of Victoria University then you're more than welcome to drop in and have tea and scones with the contributors of this little rag in our little hideaway that overlooks Wellington.

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent posts

  1. An (im)possible dream: Living Wage for Vic Books
  2. Salient and VUW tussle over Official Information Act requests
  3. One Ocean
  4. Orphanage voluntourism a harmful exercise
  5. Interview with Grayson Gilmour
  6. Political Round Up
  7. A Town Like Alice — Nevil Shute
  8. Presidential Address
  9. Do You Ever Feel Like a Plastic Bag?
  10. Sport
1

Editor's Pick

In Which a Boy Leaves

: - SPONSORED - I’ve always been a fairly lucky kid. I essentially lucked out at birth, being born white, male, heterosexual, to a well off family. My life was never going to be particularly hard. And so my tale begins, with another stroke of sheer luck. After my girlfriend sugge