Viewport width =
May 13, 2019 | by  | in News Splash |
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

Zero Carbon? Zero Problems?

Last Wednesday, the government set a global precedent with its Climate Change Response Bill, also referred to as the Zero Carbon bill, which aims to help limit the global average temperature increase to 1.5° Celsius over the next 30 years.

 

This goal, set out in the bill, seeks to “strike a balance between flexibility and prescription in New Zealand’s long-term transition”.

 

Its “split gases approach” treats long-lived gases (such as carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide) differently to short-lived gases (e.g. methane).

 

All greenhouse gas emissions, aside from methane, will need to be reduced to net zero by January 1, 2050. The reduction target for methane, which primarily comes from the agricultural industry, is 10% by 2030.  

 

Climate change professor David Frame said that New Zealand is world-leading in its split gases approach.

 

“Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide continue to warm as long as you’re omitting any of them, but if methane emissions decline then they’re cooling the climate. So they’re undoing previous warming.”

 

Spokespeople from organisations like Federated Farmers and Beef + Lamb New Zealand are calling the methane goals unfair and unreasonable.

 

Frame agrees that the farmers have a good point, “We haven’t really had a public burden-sharing conversation, so farmers will be asked not just to stop their warming from methane, […]  but they’re going to be asked to mask everyone else’s’ warming, while everyone else is still driving cars and flying airplanes.”

 

Jason Young, Political Science and International Relations Professor, said that it’s important for advocates of the bill to continue pressuring these sanctions on individual industries.

 

“If the regulatory framework is robust and has teeth, New Zealand business will adapt and seize the domestic and international opportunities sustainable business presents.”

 

“There is a legitimate conversation to be had about what the sea of balance is between sectoral efforts to combat climate change,” said Frame.

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

About the Author ()

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent posts

  1. Meet the Candidates: VUW Students and Grads Running for Council
  2. Climate Strike : Take Two
  3. The Privilege of Ignoring Race
  4. La’u Pele. My beloved.
  5. My Name is My Name
  6. ‘Then You Can’t Tell Me Not***g Right?’
  7. The best things in life aren’t free
  8. Free Speech at risk at University – Shalom Students Association
  9. Thursdays in Black Continuing Kaupapa with Club Launch
  10. Largest-ever teachers’ strike scheduled for Wednesday

Editor's Pick

Burnt Honey

: First tutorial of the year. When I open the door, I underestimate my strength, thinking it to be all used up in my journey here. It swings open violently and I trip into the room where awkward gazes greet me. Frozen, my legs are lead and I’m stuck on display for too long. My ov