<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salient &#187; Big Mouth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://salient.org.nz/author/big-mouth/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://salient.org.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s something to mull over</title>
		<link>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over-3</link>
		<comments>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Mouth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Here's something to mull over]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salient.org.nz/?p=14584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spotlight last week has been on online auctions, and the evidence seems to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro"><b>T</b>he spotlight last week has been on online auctions, and the evidence seems to be that people in New Zealand are overwhelmingly stupid. Three items have been picked up by several media sources over the last week, the biggy being $1.2 million worth of missing tax over the last couple of years. Apparently, all those people who have been making a decent income from selling stuff on TradeMe didn’t think they would have to pay any tax—Chris Budge from TradeMe said that people “are stupid if they think they will get away with not paying tax”, but considering that they have got away with it for two years, it seems that maybe it’s IRD that was a bit stupid to take so long to pick up on it.</p>
<p>Still, tax evasion isn’t as novel an idea as selling ghosts on TradeMe, and I can’t help marveling at how many idiots are willing to fork out money for two jars, which the seller claims contain holy water and the spirits of an old man and a little girl. Still, the 149 bids that were placed, reaching $2830, didn’t amaze me as much as some of the comments on the auction. As well as those criticising the seller for not putting the spirits at rest, people wanted to know what would happen if they released the spirits, whether they were edible, whether they could be drunk, and whether the seller wanted to copyright the ‘product’ and sell it as an energy drink. My fave was the person who wanted to know if the ghosts would be strong enough to scare his/her mother-in-law away. It might seem like something to giggle at, but unfortunately, news of our shame has spread as far as Britain.</p>
<p>Things don’t get any better either. An unidentified man has paid $45,000 for the virginity of a 19-year-old New Zealand girl, making him stupider than 1200 other bidders. Even if he weren’t stupid for thinking that a 19-year-old from Northland could still be a virgin, how desperate would you have to be to pay that kind of money for sex? Surely he could get a better deal in Christchurch? The prize for stupidity has to go to the girl though, who auctioned off her virginity in order to pay for her university fees. Honestly, if you can make $45k laying on your back for two minutes, why go to uni?</p>
<p>Big Mouth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over-3/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s something to mull over:</title>
		<link>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over-2</link>
		<comments>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Mouth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Here's something to mull over]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salient.org.nz/?p=14101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1350 of our nation’s police officers failed a recent fitness test, according to a recent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro"><b>1</b>350 of our nation’s police officers failed a recent fitness test, according to a recent story in the <em>Dominion Post</em>. Too many doughnuts and not enough baton-wielding may have made New Zealand’s top officers too soft. Maybe if they spent more time being cops and less time watching <em>Cops</em>, they might manage to catch someone more elusive than a missing remote control. The stats lends new meaning to the nickname ‘Pig’ really.</p>
<p>Auckland’s police had the most passes, probably because they’ve had the most practice. And although the story didn’t report which regions fared the worst, Wellingtonians will be pleased—or not—to learn that they have at least a 21 per cent chance of encountering an unfit Police officer. Although in all fairness, a lazy police force is matched by a lazy population. Even those people who can be bothered getting off their couches in order to steal someone else’s, probably can’t outlast a senior citizen on a mobility scooter. Cops should just take their most wanted lists down to all the fast food places and keep a look out, they’d probably catch most people that way. No one will believe us when we tell our grandkids that cops used to run around on foot. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s something to mull over</title>
		<link>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over</link>
		<comments>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Big Mouth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salient.org.nz/?p=13755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Kevin Smith thinks that fat people should get an extra seat on the airplane [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro"><b>S</b>o, Kevin Smith thinks that fat people should get an extra seat on the airplane for free. The Hollywood director blogged angrily after he was asked to leave a packed flight because he couldn’t fit into one seat. </p>
<p>It sucks to be thrown off the plane, but don’t airline policies of making people too large for one seat pay for two seem perfectly reasonable? If one pie isn’t enough to fill your tummy, you have to pay for the second one, right? You don’t get it for free, and you certainly can’t steal half of some other poor sod’s pie. </p>
<p>It’s not just a matter of paying for a second seat to stow your butt fat—if you haven’t booked two seats, you’re gonna spill over into the next person’s seat. That they paid for. Smith doesn’t seem to care about the person who was going to have to sit next to him! If anyone <em>could</em> fit next to him. The airline not only put Smith on a later flight, they also gave him a $100 voucher! And he’s still angry! </p>
<p>My luggage and I collectively weigh less than Smith; shouldn’t I be the one to get money for using less than one seat, rather than the person who uses more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://salient.org.nz/columns/heres-something-to-mull-over/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: salient.org.nz @ 2012-05-26 05:49:14 -->
